<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Now, While Rails is Weak, We Must Strike!”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Joey deVilla's blog on nerdy life, work and play</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rails Maintainers (and Users), Take a Hint! by Stay N&#8217; Alive - Social Media, Technology, and Rants From the Life of Jesse Stay</title>
		<link>http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Rails Maintainers (and Users), Take a Hint! by Stay N&#8217; Alive - Social Media, Technology, and Rants From the Life of Jesse Stay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-902</guid>
		<description>[...] appears I&#8217;ve caused quite a stir in my post about asking Perl to step up. Joey DeVilla on Global Nerdy thinks I&#8217;m funny. Several Perl users, including Andy Lester (author of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appears I&#8217;ve caused quite a stir in my post about asking Perl to step up. Joey DeVilla on Global Nerdy thinks I&#8217;m funny. Several Perl users, including Andy Lester (author of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey deVilla</title>
		<link>http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey deVilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-901</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Phab:&lt;/strong&gt; Actually, the pedantically correct way to spell it is &lt;strong&gt;"de Villa"&lt;/strong&gt;. Trust me, I'm the domain expert in this instance.

As for Perl, when version 6 comes out, I'll give it a serious look. As I mentioned in &lt;a href="http://globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/“now-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike”/#comment-5304" rel="nofollow"&gt;an earlier comment&lt;/a&gt;, while the current incarnations of Perl aren't my thing, the language features in 6.0 that I saw in &lt;a href="http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/07/05/damian-conways-talk-tonight-fun-with-dead-languages/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Damian Conway's presentation in the summer of 2006&lt;/a&gt; impressed me.

There's also a pragmatic consideration: &lt;a href="http://www.tsotinc.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;my current job&lt;/a&gt; -- which pays quite well -- involves Ruby and not Perl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Phab:</strong> Actually, the pedantically correct way to spell it is <strong>&#8220;de Villa&#8221;</strong>. Trust me, I&#8217;m the domain expert in this instance.</p>
<p>As for Perl, when version 6 comes out, I&#8217;ll give it a serious look. As I mentioned in <a href="http://globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/“now-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike”/#comment-5304" rel="nofollow">an earlier comment</a>, while the current incarnations of Perl aren&#8217;t my thing, the language features in 6.0 that I saw in <a href="http://www.joeydevilla.com/2006/07/05/damian-conways-talk-tonight-fun-with-dead-languages/" rel="nofollow">Damian Conway&#8217;s presentation in the summer of 2006</a> impressed me.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a pragmatic consideration: <a href="http://www.tsotinc.com/" rel="nofollow">my current job</a> &#8212; which pays quite well &#8212; involves Ruby and not Perl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phab</title>
		<link>http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Phab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-900</guid>
		<description>Catalyst+DBIx::Class already put RoR+ActiveRecord into shame, making them look just ridiculous baby toys. No need for any revenge. Just ruth. (Though admittedly, any Python framework is even worse).

Ah, one last thing: using a Java-like case for your name is just wrong: originally it probably was "De Villa" (if really you don't like it, use an underscore instead: "de_villa").

Learn Perl, it's never too late.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catalyst+DBIx::Class already put RoR+ActiveRecord into shame, making them look just ridiculous baby toys. No need for any revenge. Just ruth. (Though admittedly, any Python framework is even worse).</p>
<p>Ah, one last thing: using a Java-like case for your name is just wrong: originally it probably was &#8220;De Villa&#8221; (if really you don&#8217;t like it, use an underscore instead: &#8220;de_villa&#8221;).</p>
<p>Learn Perl, it&#8217;s never too late.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Joey, you have a great attitude (and I love the graphic). Playing Devil's advocate I must point out that since Perl 6 will run Perl 5, Catalyst is already implemented in it, as it were. Some of the new code in 5.10 (and I think it will be use for 6) for method resolution order came out of the Catalyst project. It really is awesome.

Strangely enough I came to Catalyst instead of Rails because two years ago when I tried to pick up Rails the tutorials would not run on my box. So instead of spending the weekend debugging a simple installation procedure, I installed Catalyst and had a demo application running in 30 seconds.

Also, Jese is being goofy. It's not a competition, it's an ecosystem. And Ruby never took the web away from Perl. That was PHP and it did it by more or less being a partial copy of Perl 4 plus 600 new keywords to replace the need to know or use the CPAN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joey, you have a great attitude (and I love the graphic). Playing Devil&#8217;s advocate I must point out that since Perl 6 will run Perl 5, Catalyst is already implemented in it, as it were. Some of the new code in 5.10 (and I think it will be use for 6) for method resolution order came out of the Catalyst project. It really is awesome.</p>
<p>Strangely enough I came to Catalyst instead of Rails because two years ago when I tried to pick up Rails the tutorials would not run on my box. So instead of spending the weekend debugging a simple installation procedure, I installed Catalyst and had a demo application running in 30 seconds.</p>
<p>Also, Jese is being goofy. It&#8217;s not a competition, it&#8217;s an ecosystem. And Ruby never took the web away from Perl. That was PHP and it did it by more or less being a partial copy of Perl 4 plus 600 new keywords to replace the need to know or use the CPAN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey deVilla</title>
		<link>http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey deVilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Gavin:&lt;/strong&gt; If it works for you, more power to you. Perl in its current form drives me bonkers, so I'm afraid Catalyst isn't for me.

(Now if and when Perl 6 -- which from Damian Conway's presentations looks like it won't drive me bonkers -- comes out and Catalyst gets implemented in it, we'll talk.)

In case any of you readers were wondering about the Catalyst framework, &lt;a href="http://catalyst.perl.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;you can find out more at its official website&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Gavin:</strong> If it works for you, more power to you. Perl in its current form drives me bonkers, so I&#8217;m afraid Catalyst isn&#8217;t for me.</p>
<p>(Now if and when Perl 6 &#8212; which from Damian Conway&#8217;s presentations looks like it won&#8217;t drive me bonkers &#8212; comes out and Catalyst gets implemented in it, we&#8217;ll talk.)</p>
<p>In case any of you readers were wondering about the Catalyst framework, <a href="http://catalyst.perl.org/" rel="nofollow">you can find out more at its official website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalnerdy.com/2008/01/02/%e2%80%9cnow-while-rails-is-weak-we-must-strike%e2%80%9d/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>Catalyst already beats Rails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catalyst already beats Rails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
