<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global Nerdy &#187; dynamic programming languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalnerdy.com/tag/dynamic-programming-languages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalnerdy.com</link>
	<description>Tech Evangelist Joey deVilla on Shopify, startups, software development, tech news and other nerdy stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Chandler&#8217;s Demise Evidence that Dynamic Languages Can&#8217;t Scale?</title>
		<link>http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/21/is-chandlers-demise-evidence-that-dynamic-languages-cant-scale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/21/is-chandlers-demise-evidence-that-dynamic-languages-cant-scale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey deVilla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas and Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barking up the wrong tree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chandler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic programming languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language wars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalnerdy.com/2008/01/21/is-chandlers-demise-evidence-that-dynamic-languages-cant-scale/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Manageability.org asks the question &#8220;Is Chandler&#8217;s Demise Evidence that Dynamic Languages Can&#8217;t Scale?&#8221;. For a quick reply, I&#8217;ll quote a Reddit comment: &#8220;Even if it was, such a badly-managed project wouldn&#8217;t be a good example.&#8221; Software projects have failed long before the current dynamic language hoopla &#8212; see Jeff &#8220;Coding Horror&#8221; Atwood&#8217;s article, The Long, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://www.manageability.org/"><cite>Manageability.org</cite></a> asks the question <a href="http://www.manageability.org/blog/stuff/chandler-failure"><strong>&#8220;Is Chandler&#8217;s Demise Evidence that Dynamic Languages Can&#8217;t Scale?&#8221;</strong></a>. For a quick reply, I&#8217;ll quote a <cite>Reddit</cite> comment: <a href="http://programming.reddit.com/info/663gi/comments/c02y9hp">&#8220;Even if it was, such a badly-managed project wouldn&#8217;t be a good example.&#8221;</a> Software projects have failed long before the current dynamic language hoopla &#8212; see Jeff &#8220;<cite>Coding Horror</cite>&#8221; Atwood&#8217;s article, <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000588.html"><cite>The Long, Dismal History of Software Project Failure</cite></a> and the articles he cites for a backgrounder. All the projects cited in these articles most likely were developed in solid, respectable, God-fearing, non-communist static languages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalnerdy.com/2008/01/21/is-chandlers-demise-evidence-that-dynamic-languages-cant-scale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

