I Have an Advance Copy of Neal Stephenson’s “Anathem”! It just arrived at the office, and I’ve written about it here.
RubyFringe: Day 2 Notes, Part 3
Photo by Carsten.
Click the photo to see it on its Flickr page.
Pete Forde Break
- When the idea for this first started, it was much simpler: "Let's throw a merb conference, it would be awesome!" - We love you people a lot - This has exceeded our expectations - Meghann: I see her every morning when I arrive, and she works late - Rubyfringe has become like a monolith in space for us - Meghann did all the heavy lifting - [standing ovation for Meghann] - Rubyfringe next year? In Portland, next year, it's going to be awesome! - But seriously, maybe we'll have one again next year. We'll have to think about it.
Ruby.rewrite(Ruby) (Reginald Braithwaite)
Photo by Libin Pan.
Click the photo to see it on its Flickr page.
- I'm happy to be here with the smart people and good people - Being interested in the same things that smart people are interested in is not the same thing as being smart - I had no idea what Pete was thinking when he came up with the "RubyFringe" concept -- did he mean the fringe of the Ruby community, or did he mean the fringe of the Ruby language - The conference seems to be a nice mix of both - andand - Groovy has an andand built in; it's called the Elvis operator - The Haskell people said "Reg is just inventing the maybe monad in Haskell" [shows code] - There has to be a better way - If returning nil -- method_missing - "Yes, I know because I heard the guy who wrote it says it sucks" - I'm using it because I'm hardcore - Problem: we've opened up the Object class - andand is really slow - This is not a performance bug - A Haskeller will tell you that the problem is solved - Haskell has lazy evaluation - Haskell never bother evaluating stuff that will always be nil - Ruby isn't "turtles all the way down" -- it doesn't give you all the tools it has for itself - @logger.debug is expensive - Make it a block! - Or do if defined? - This is going to sound smarmy -- you know, the way it sounds smarmy when people say "I don't know how to do this" or play dumb to seem more "real", but I swear this is true: I'm not good with IDEs - I think that when IDEs give you some kind of wizard or other feature to simplify some aspect of programming, it's a sign of a defect in the language you're using - Ruby's open classes and "eager eval-by-default" are problems - There are probably a number of ways to get around it -- my way was to use macros - Using Rewrite gets around the open class problem - Yes, it turns your code into this shit [shows slide] but better by far to have the code do it than your IDE - [shows benchmarks] As you can see, it performance is far better than doing it by opening up the Object class - Rewrite version of andand doesn't execute the shit - Okay, this is tather nichey stuff - You know the saying that people don't by drills or drill bits, but they buy *holes*? Think of Rewrite as diamond dust that you use to make drill bits. Maybe you'll make use of it, but most people won't - Just a quick note -- in his presentation, Giles [Bowkett] renamed lambda as L because he needed to use it a lot. - Having to do that is a code smell - Never mind making it shorter -- get rid of it entirely! [Joey note: Reg corrected himself in a blog entry written after RubyFringe, stating that having to rename lambda is *not* a code smell; it's a *language smell*. Giles is simply using the best workaround available to him. See his blog entry at http://weblog.raganwald.com/2008/07/l-is-not-code-smell.html ] - Why does Ruby read from left to right? - I have a lot of unpaid Demeter speeding tickets - thingy.thingy2.thingy3.thingy4 - Because this OOP paradigm, even Ruby goes from left to right - From time to time, people want to go from right to left - blitz.not.blank? - not is really a adverb - There's really no place for adverbs - Adverbs modify verbs, and since OOP is in the Kingdom of Nouns, they get short shrift. I'd like to see more support for adverbs. - Take a look at ruby2ruby, created by the folks at seattle.rb - It asks "Hey, interpreter, what are you actually working with?" - It does a lot of cleaning up of Ruby's s-expressions. - Lisp's s-exps are like the nice flat-pack furniture you get from IKEA; Ruby's are the furniture you find in the dumpster -- and that's the stuff left over after a couple of people have been through it first. - In the end, Ruby is like Lisp. Except you do all this work up front, and you do all this work on the back, and it's morepainful. - But aside from that, it's like Lisp! - Abstraction solves every problem except for one: the problem you have when there are too many layers of abstraction - If working with the tool is worse than the problem, then the tool is bad - Maybe you've been taken in by Home Depot -- they sell you on how easy it is to do the job. Many tools make the job part easy to do, but often they make cleaning up after the job more difficult - Need to consider this when using or building tools - I know that I don't have the best solution for this - I *do* know that we have don't have enough competing solutions - I don't believe that "open classes" is sustainable
Conceptual Algorithms (Tom Preston-Warner)
- When I was 7 years old, I'd fight with my brother over the TV - I vividly remember a time I was so frustrated that I ran to the top of the stairs, took off my shoe, and threw it at my brother's face. - Naturally, this led to a "time out" -- we were both sent to our rooms and told to think about what we'd done and if there was a better way to handle things... - What happened? - Are there better ways to resolve it that shoe-throwing? - Problem solving can be broken down into these steps: 1. Think about the problem 2. Proposed solutions 3. Evaluate the benefits and consequences of those proposed solutions 4. Select the best soltuion - I wrote chronic, god, fixture scenarios, fuzed, grit - I work at Powerset -- now Microsoft - Just realized John Lam and I are colleagues! I'm going to have to catch up with him when I get back - I co-founded GitHub - Conceptual Algorithm: Scientific Method - Geoff covered in his philosophy talk - It's one of the most powerful conceptual algorithms ever devised 1. Define the question 2. Gather info and resources 3. Form a hyptothesis 4. Analyze and interpret the data 5. Plan 6. Publish the data - How *not* to do science - To fix a memory leak in god.rb, I didn't use a reasonable methodology at first. - I just tried commenting stuff out to see if eliminated the leak - It was random and didn't get any real results - Then I tried the scientific method - Go see "science and god.rb" -- my use of the scientific method to fix a bug in god.rb is documented at: http://groups.google.com/group/god-rb/browse_thread/thread/01cca2b7c4a581c2 - Conceptual Algorithm: Memory Initialization - George Dantzig - Imagine a situation where you come late to class and everyone's already gone, but there are two math problems on the blackboard. You copy them down, take them home, find the solutions and hand them in, under the impression that it's just an overdue assignment - Now imagine that a little while later, you discover that those problems were strictly for display because they were considered unsolved problems by the mathematics community at large! - Everybody wants to be that dude -- and George Dantzig was that dude at UC Berkeley - The "memory initialization" algorithm works like this: - "I have a problem" - "I am going to disregard everything I know about a problem" - When you don't know about a problem domain, you often bring in a new perspective, no limits and no limits - Rather than look at existing work when developing chronic, a Ruby natural-language date parser, I worked from first principles - Sometimes coming in "fresh" and working from first principles gets you results! - Conceptual Algorithm: Iteration - In making what is considered to be the best vaccuum cleaner in the world, James Dyson -- actually SIR James Dyson -- built 5127 prototypes - He said: "Making mistakes is the most important thing you can do" - Knighted for his efforts - Conceptual Algorithm: Vaporset Corollary - Hard problems take a long time to solve - When harangued about why you haven't got any results yet, ignore the wankers - In the end, your long, hard work can pay off: Powerset sold to Microsoft for $100 million - Charles Darwin - Took 20 years on his evolution research - He published his finding only when his colleague Wallace said "Hey! You should publish this!" - [shows picture of Darwin] Look at those sideburns! He's awesome! - Conceptual Algorithm: Breadth-First Search - There are over 2500 programming languages. Why just explore only 2 or 4? - My original title was "Sapir-Whorf for Robots", but I didn't think it would catch on - For developing Fuzed, I tried using Erlang - The most important thing about trying a new language is to just accept the syntax. A strange new syntax often turns off developers -- tell yourself: "The syntax is okay" - Conceptual Algorithm: Imagining the Ideal Solution - There's an example of this in god's config file - If you're creating a language, don't model it after English. That's retarded. - Config files are just big lists. You can't do loops or other things that we take for granted in programming languages - god config files are just Ruby - Conceptual Algorithm: Dedicate Thinking Time - You should set aside some time to just think - Sometimes the best things come from this - One example: Gravatar, the avatar system -- this came up during my thinking time, and I did all right selling it to Automattic last year - A guy who devoted a lot of time for thinking: Rene Descartes - He's fringe to the max! I know Babbage is RubyFringe's mascot, but I think Descartes should've been the guy - Many accomplishments: a major philosopher and the father of analytic geometry - He got on the Pope's list of prohibited books! How cool is that? - Conceptual Algorithm: Cash Filter - There comes a point when you need to build something that makes you money - Conceptual Algorithm: Deathbed Filter - Imagine yourself on your deathbed - Think about a decision you have right now - Think about yourself in the future -- imagine yourself looking back on that decision. Would it be a good memory or a bad memory?
Sinatra (Blake Mizerany)
- Sinatra is a micro-framework - Less than 2K LOC in GitHub, including blank lines and comments - Sinatra "hello world" is simple - Rails was too slow - Multiple Mongrel handlers getting cumbersome to maintain - Same reasons as most for starting a new framework - Camping is awesome, but...nuff said - Freaks - Islands on Second Life - git-wiki by Simon Rozet - Ultimate REST client - RESTClient + Sinatra - No longer have to use curl 7 WTFs of Sinatra - Why am I falling for Sinatra?
Be Good (Leila Boujnane)
- People have been asking how I've been doing, and I've lately been saying "not too good" - Some kind of aphasia-like symptoms [Get well sooon, Leila!] - Founder of Idee Inc., which makes image search - I'm probably the only person at this conference using notes - Martin: here from Copenhagen - Needed a break -- working really really hard - Really really tired - Couple of days, realy tired - Use giant Post-It notes to think process - Have been having trouble writing ideas down -- a sort of aphasia - "If you make enough money in this world, you can smoke pot all day and have people killed." -- Patton Oswalt - I am not one of those interesting individuals - Here's something that was true when you were growing up and it's true today: Let's not have people killed. Let's be good. - "What does a man need -- really need? A few pounds of food each day, heat and shelter, six feet to lie down in -- and some form of working activity that will yield a sense of accomplishment." -- "The Wanderer" by Sterling Hayden - We have been brainwashed into belonging to an economic system that says you need more than that. Way more. - How do we start to make the world a better place? - I work long hours, seven days a week, and I love my job - I love my clients - Every day you walk in and have to make a set of decisions - These are the early days - Make something people want - Paul Graham: "If you make people with money love you, you can probably get some of it." - Idee: Gives people a better way to search for images - Nothing more gratifying than an inbox full of messages from happy people who love what you make - It's satisfying -- you feel wanted and desired - If you are not good at what you do, you end up resorting to being bad - You may have to cheat - Bully - Lie to your customers - Your adoption rate is not tied to the number of people who you bully into adoption! - Contrary to what a VC will tell you: don't focus on business models first - Instead, focus on building something useful first. - *Then* focus on the business model, *after* you've proven your usefulness - Crappy products plus sales equals unhappy users - It's all about happiness and being good!
RubyFringe: Day 2 Notes, Part 2
Jabl: The Language You Will Hate (Hampton Catlin)
- This is the best-case week we could have ever hoped for
- JavaScript bugs the shit out of me!
- Nathan is da man! He makes HAML what it is today and he played a big part in a lot of today’s stuff. I’m just some dumb shit with ideas.
- If a lot of programmers really dislike an idea, but can’t give you a reason why, it’s probably a good one
- I like writing languages! It’s super fun!
- I’m not in love with Python, but I think indentation’s better! It’s one of the few things Python gets right.
- People are really defensive about JavaScript. It’s like you punched their mom in the face.
- It’s a fairly decent general-purpose language
- I think it belongs more on the server side than on the browser
- It got so beaten up. mocked and put down initially that when we discovered it was a real language, we came to defend it rabidly
- JavaScript is a fucking terrible browser language, hence many people have created frameworks to overcome its shortcomings
- The JS world has nothing to do with the DOM world. JavaScript and the DOM
connect only because they’re glued together by the document
- The DOM is a really cool thing!
- CSS is nice — with it, we can talk about the DOM. Why are we not outraged that we can’t do this with JavaScript?
- If you’re saying “I don’t want to learn a new language”, what the hell are you doing in this field?
- Jabl compiles into jquery
Archaeopteryx (Giles Bowkett)
- I was going to have a contest to give away this book, O’Reilly’s “JavaScript: The Good Parts”. As you can see, it’s a small book.
- Audience member: “Just give it to Hampton!”
- During his presentation about jazz and programming, Nick didn’t talk about
what I consider to be modern variants — hip-hop groups like A Tribe Called
Quest and Roni Size’s drum and bass are things I consider to be jazz. - I have 496 slides. I don’t think I’m going to get through them all!
- The Mainstream
- The mainstream is not just lame, it can get you *killed*
- Take a look at the life of Heath Ledger. Go check out his Wikipedia entry
- Most people don’t know that in his youth, he was a chess champion
- He had a lot of mental energy, and like such people, he suffered from insomnia
- Insomnia is a solved problem: hypnosis works
- But…hypnosis is on the edge, on the fringe, even though it has been around for and working for over 100 years
- So they didn’t use hypnosis, but put him on pills, which killed him
- At Railsconf 2008, David Heinemeier Hansson talked about “The Great Surplus”, in which he says that there’s still something missing from mainstream languages and tech that gives Ruby and Rails a surplus of power and
capability, but that this surplus was limited. - DHH says people eventually figure out the cool tools and the surplus will go away.
- I think he’s wrong: the mainstream *never* catches up — it’s too easy to be ordinary
- The question should be: “Are we going to use that power for good, or are we going to use it for AWESOME?!”
- People should be saying “This is going to be a wicked party: I’m going to bring my laptop”
- What are we?
- Are programmers artists?
- Kai “Kai’s Power Tools” Krause would say yes
- Steve Jobs’ said: “Real artists ship”
- Leonardo da Vinci was a real artist, but there’s a lot of stuff he designed that he never shipped (the hang glider, helicopter, and so on)
- One of his bridge designs was never built until this century when the Swedish government decided to build it. Talk about failing the “release early, release often” mantra!
- In many instances, his genius was wasted.
- How does genius get wasted?
- In the old days, an artist would seek a patron
- Patrons were rich nobles who wanted to look good
- An artist with a patronage would create works in the name of or that glorified the patron
- If you accept that programmers are artists, then VCs are patrons
- Let’s talk about adventure for a moment
- During the boom, working for a startup was often sold to prospective employees as an adventure
- Let me tell you about adventures:
- When I moved out of the house, I went to Chicago and lived in a ghetto because my need to create art was actually greater than my need for safety
- When I lived in New Mexico, I found bear droppings not more than ten feet from my front door on a regular basis
- I used to carry a .357 Magnum with me because the area was being prowled by a mountain lion. You need a big fucking gun to take down that kind of animal
- I used to get calls from my parents where they’d tell me that they’d just caught a rattlesnake, killed it and threw it onto the barbecue and would you like to come to dinner?
- [Something about “psycho rocks” — I was laughing so hard that I wasn’t able to take down notes at this point — Joey]
- I’ve also done enough LSD to kill a herd of elephants
- Now consider what you were doing when you were going on a dot-com “adventure”:
- You get to sit for 4 years at a desk
- Maybe, if you’re really lucky, your options might turn into something
- Who are these weasel-brained Muppetfuckers?
- These people who tell you that working for them is an adventure: they’re not fools; they’re *liars*
- It all comes back to a system of patronage — this is just the modern version
- Just as landed nobles gave artists money for the artists to look good, VCs give geeks money so that they can brag
- [showing a picture of Julia Allison in a skimpy little dress, surrounded by admiring geeks]: This woman is wearing programmers!
- You are just their pet monkeys!
- If the company IPOs and you are lucky, you can start collecting pet monkeys of your own
- I’m not kidding about the “pet monkey” thing. Think of Google, with their ball pit playpens and other niceties with which they coddle you: it is in their economic interest for their employees to think of themselves as Google’s children!
- If not for the Muppetfuckers who couldn’t see the value of Leonardo’s hang-gliders and helicopters, we could’ve had them hundreds of years sooner!
- As programmers, we get to create things that didn’t exist before
- Why should we waste that on things like Pets.com and stock market price grafts?
- So I learned to draw. I was a starving artist
- But the people who run this industry are scum
- Only 3 months prior, I was working at Morgan Stanley for $75/hour
- At that time, 2001, I made $7.50/hour at a gas station
- Here’s a picture of an RV that I lived in in New Mexico
- VCs are:
- the causes of economic instability
- “stock puppets”
- Because of these Muppetfuckers, someone you could have called a genius was instead just building bullshit back in 1997
- The lesson?
- Build your business with your money
- With your money, you’re the boss
- Consider the case of Engine Yard: the VCs need Engine Yard, not the other way aroung
- It’s becoming more common: as startups get cheaper to launch, VCs find themselves in the cold
- The VC company Benchmark Capital says that open source enriches the ecosystem, which is why they backed MySQL, Red Hat, JBoss
- Look at Jay Phillips — he leveraged Adhearsion to create consulting work — he is an internet startup
- The probability matrix
- Drum machines are simply matrix builders
- Rows in the matrix represent individual drums
- Columns in the matrix respresent a beat played at a given time
- You want drum X to play at time Y? Just put a “1” in [X, Y]
- In 4/4 time there are 4 beats ber par, and typically drum machines play music in 4-bar chunks making 16 beats
- So the probability matrices are 16-element arrays
- But rather than just either playing or not playing the drum at any given point, you assign a probability
- You want there to be a 25% chance that drum X gets played at time Y? Put a “.25” in [X, Y]
- It’s social software
- Archaeopteryx generates rhythms through probability matrices
- It’s open source. I’m not worried, because the name of the game isn’t locking people out, it’s providing superior service at the same or better price point and competing with people who are illiterate about an important part of their job
- Maybe I won’t be able to say “My career is Archaeopteryx” I’ll be happy if I simply say “My career *includes* Archaeopteryx”
- What wonderful things would we have seen?
- What if the guy who built the board for Sasha open-sourced his design?
- This DJ mixer is in a niche market
- [At this point in the presentation, Giles’ allotted time had run out, but people stayed to hear the rest, and the organizers let him run with it because the audience was enraptured by this point. — Joey]
- As such, it unleashes new creative possibilities
- [Photo] Here’s his DJ mixer. It’s not a traditional DJ mixer, but a MIDI controller
- [Photo of DJ Sasha] Here’s a DJ that gets paid $25K a night
- One day, I want to be able to say “My career is Archaeopteryx”
- Takes advantage of the fact that MIDI [Musicial Instrument Digital Interface] is cheap and ubiquitious, controlling more than just instruments, but lights, effects, visuals and other things
- Lightweight
- Archaeopteryx is a Ruby midi generator
- Archaeopteryx
- OOP
- It’s irresponsible to use Ruby and not leverage its power
- You should make your own OOP paradigms — that what Ruby is for!
- Archaeopteryx uses lambda a lot — so much that I’ve had to alias “L” to lambda
- Loads of lambdas in the code
- In the OOP used in Archaeopteryx — objects act as host for methods, which can be redefined at any time
- Goes to core of why mainstream is dangerous
- Ledger just went with the crowd
- There is absolutely nobody that does not do that
- It’s incedibly meta
- Altering rhythms is adding a lambda to an array of lambdas using a lambda picked out of a queue
- It’s the use of the strategy pattern to play beats
- There’s a strategy for deciding which strategy to use
- “Ruby is like Cthulhu in that it goes beyond sanity”
- I plan to use it at Burning Man and have it running continuously for the full 7 days
- Archaeopteryx’s core MIDI code comes from “Practical Ruby Projects”
- Vaporware alert! I’ve got 2 things planned for user-generated visuals in Archaeopteryx
- 1. MIDI VJ software
- 2. “Drum circle”
- Take a number of drums and rig them with Bluetooth touch sensors
- Use them to trigger JRuby/Processing
- Use that input as a voting system for what beats to emphasize
- Updating the probability matrix based on this is trivial
- End result: people can influence the music in real time
- Andy Warhol said “Good business is the best art”
- “Steve [Jobs], you ridiculous douche…”
- You don’t need an IPO, you don’t need an exit strategy, that’s fail 2.0
- Computers are everywhere, which means that you can do anything
- Language wars are bullshit — it doesn’t matter whether I’m doing music with Ruby or whatever other language is out there
- It’s about passion
- Maybe being a programmer is not a *what* but a *how*
- Maybe being a programmer is about applying programming to your passions
- Go and build! Build for yourself, not the VCs
- And remember: real artists ship!
- [Standing ovation]
CouchDB and Me (Damian Katz)
- Sell my house, move my family and live off savings? WHY?
- This is not a tech talk, but about the considerations behind this decision
- [Shows photo of baby daughter to great applause]
- Why jeopardize this beautiful young family?
- I got laid off and had to look for a new job
- I had a house and the associated mortgage
- I looked around and didn’t see anything I wanted to work on
- “Other people work on cool stuff…why not me?”
- They’re out there, doing cool things they love — designing motorcycles, making music and creating art
- How do people get jobs where they get to work on cool things, work on what they want, and get paid for it?
- So I made my decision: sell the house, move someplace cheaper and live off my savings
- Reasons for doing this:
- It would be educational
- I’d get to spend more time with my family
- It would be a test to see what I can do
- It would make for an interesting story
- Moved to Charlotte, North Carolina. The cost of living was cheaper and we had family there
- Change in Lifestyle
- Thought I could live with fewer things, but the downgrade hurt!
- Nobody wants to get wrapped up in a consumerist lifestyle, with the big house and the nice stuff
- Had to go to the local Goodwill to buy furniture — being in there, thinking “I was better than these people”, but followed quickly by “What is wrong with you?” — these were just people trying to save money and get by. I wasn’t all that different and certainly no better than they were
- Couldn’t shake that feeling that I was an unemployed loser
- So what to build?
- I worked on Lotus Notes for years
- I thought: I’m going to extract the good stuff from Notes, get rid of the crap and maybe something good can result
- The development process in the new environment:
- I’m away from all my development friends
- Developed in C++: storage engine, view engine, query language
- Had trouble seeing past the complexity
- Went into panic mode
- I ordered “Code Complete” from Amazon, hoping it would help — (it *is* complete and about code)
- Glad to *not* get new information out of it. The important thing is that it helped me to just push forward with the project
- Decided to use Erlang –– “I knew Erlang before it was cool” (It was never cool)
- In late 2007, my cash reserves were drying up
- I looked heavily at VCs and angels and discounted them quickly
- I decided that I didn’t want to sell out CouchDB to commercial interests
- Got a job — a cool one — at MySQL
- There, I wrote the CouchDB that you know
- IBM
- I was approached by IBM
- Wrote back to the guy who contacted me, saying that I was not interested because they had too many douchebags
- Surprisingly, he replied with “Send me the same email, but clean up the language”
- So I did: s/douchebags/vapid bureaucrats/
- He sent it around his department
- The result, they offered to pay him to work on CouchDB, and to keep it open, all the code I wrote for it went to the Apache Foundation
- IBM really stepped up to the plate — they really helped CouchDB happen
- As much I’m down on them, they’re a positive force in the tech industry. They’re big supporters of open source and big supporters of the tech industry in general
- Q & A
- When did it catch on?: When I added JSON
- How’d the core team get together?I really don’t know
- Only met one of them in person (Jan)
- He’s been doing the evangelizing
- They were basically volunteers who kept adding and it became “I guess you’re part of the project now”
An Amusing RubyFringe Moment
This is funnier if you happen to follow the Ruby programming scene or know me and Zed Shaw:
RubyFringe: Day 2 Notes, Part 1
If Kant Had a Computer (Geoffrey Grosenbach)
- Super special trivia fact: Only speaker to wear utilikilt - I was going to throw the word "philosophy" into the title of this presentation, but I remembered what Hawking wrote in "Brief Hisory of Time": his publisher said that for every equation he put in the book, he'd halve the readership - This isn't going to be a super-practical talk - My degree was in philosophy - Had computers been around back then, some of the philosophers may have hacked; I think it would've appealed to them - But since they did not have computers, they became mathematicians and thinkers instead - A number of philosophy and programming concepts were the same - Immanuel Kant's most famous work is "Critique of Pure Reason" - Written in German, but it's so obtuse that even German students read the English translation, which is supposedly easier to understand - Kant wrote easier-to-read follow-up in which he lambasted people for not being able to follow Critique of Pure Reason - Don't worry: I found ideas from books that are easier to understand than Kant's - The natural vs. the simulated - Philosophers like to think that their thoughts match up in the real world - a priori vs. a posteriori knowledge - Mythical Man-Month: We're building things out of pure thought-stuff - In philosophy, I learned about different ways of thinking, arguing and fallacies - I can see where this knowledge would help -- I recently read a "Rails doesn't scale" post in a blog, where the rebuttal in the comments went "Too much emphasis on REST and not enough on internationalization is why it doesn't scale!" - Philosophy teaches us that a single argument against something is not enough to refute it - Consider these three points below. Where are they from?: 1. Limit new features to a well-defined scope 2. Implement the feature, analyze the result 3. Take the result into account for subsequent features - Did they come from a 37signals manifesto? Scrum? Agile? - No, it's the scientific method! - The method is centuries old: take an idea, test it, measure, record and report the results - As developers, we're kind of detached from the process: - In many cases, we just do the implementation - Sometimes the idea's not ours - Oftentimes we don't do the analysis or consider the result for subsequent features - Exercise for the reader: Contrast the scientific method with development - Music - I play the double bass, a big instrument - Everyone knows what a cello is, but nobody recognizes an upright bass - Been playing for a while, but finally found a great jazz teacher - I learn by doing, being made to perform with other musicians in the class - Old ideas have been around for a long time - As a bass player (as mentioned in the jazz presentation yesterday), my is to provide the root. Typically, I want to play the lowest note possible - That's a constraint -- I'm working within a set of rules - Working with Less - Miles Davis: criticized for playing too few notes - Improvising: instead of starting out by running through the notes, start with silence, play a note or two, and then just get on with it - DeMorgan's Law: - not (p or q) = (not p) and (not q) - A useful identity! - Recent study of PhD's: the philosophy majors were the most employed group - Philosophy is just math expressed as statements of logic - Terms, referents, proper names, designators, initial baptism - Saul Kripke: Naming and Necessity - Descriptivist theory of names - For any name, we can come up with a list of descriptives that identify that name - For example, for the name "Hampton Catlin", we can come up with descriptives like: "Works at Unspace", "Lives in Toronto", "Changes his hair frequently" - Causal theory of reference (advocated by Kripke): When a baby is born and given a name, from that point on we can have a causal sequence... - This also applies to programming: - Creating an object involves naming it - We can match up a name with the object it references - We also have the decriptivist theory of names with duck typing: - Consider the respond_to? method and other forms of introspection we use to get descriptives attached to a named object - Natural Kinds - Philosophers like to ask themselves about the way we group or categorize things: Are the groupings we create inherent in the nature of the grouped objects, or are these artificial groupings that we have assigned based on some perception we have of those things? - In web development, we like the idea of REST - It's an artificial grouping - It's the result of a decision by a person that a certain way of grouping things is the right way to do it - You need to understand REST is not a hard-and-fast natural way of organizing things, but an arbitrary way - Spinoza - He's a philosopher with an interesting life: born somewhat wealthy, worked as lens grinder, excommunicated from his church, ended up turning down a lot of honours in his life, gave family inheritance to his sister, died early - He said that the whole universe is just a single substance (you can spend weeks studying just what he meant by "substance") - Each of us is just different states and concentrations of this substance - Reminded me of cloud computing - Problem: under his philosophy, we have no free will - As programmers, we like free will (we like our programs doing what we intend them to do)
- The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis - Go look up the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis if you haven't already heard of it - Benjamin Whorf's quote: "We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages. The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds - and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds. We cut nature up, organize it into concepts, and ascribe significances as we do, largely because we are parties to an agreement to organize it in this way - an agreement that holds throughout our speech community and is codified in the patterns of our language." - The practical upshot: language anchors thought (Kant thought the same thing) - Why I like Ruby: helps me organize my thoughts - Since a programming language can shape the way you solve problems, you should stretch yourself and: - Learn other programming languages, especially if their paradigms are quite different from ones you're used to - Write different types of apps -- if you're used to writing web apps, try writing a desktop app, and vice versa - Do you typically write apps? Try your hand at writing a library! - Stretch your thinking!
Ruby Beyond Rails (John Lam)
- John works for Microsoft, so it's fitting that they used the Imperial Theme from "Star Wars" to play him in - I've been looking at the audience and making mental notes of yesterday's presentations -- I've decided to take a less conventional approach to this presentation
- In yesterday's presentation, Dan Grigsby said "You're not really on the Fringe if you work for the Man." - I was in a meeting with "The Man": Steve Ballmer, talking about how to recruit young programmers straight out of school who might not think of Microsoft as an option -- perhaps they've bought into the hype about Google - "Are you gonna go work at Google and just so you can increase their market share from 65 to 66%? Come to MS where every day is a glorious day!" - I believe that if you want to change things, the best way to do so is work in difficult circumstances - Three things I want to talk about - Go see Steve Jobs' Stanford commencement address - He talks about "connecting the dots backwards" in viewing his life - Looking at that path, he was able to see that he was going to end up where he was today - People talk about how they accidentally wind up where they are, but really, it's all a result of the choices you make - Back when I was a kid, 6502-based machines were all the rage (Apple ][, Commodore 64 and so on) - (I'm old but I have the Asian mystique working for me) - I came up with a lot of things that I didn't know already existed - Metaprogramming - 6502 assembly very limited - Built a 16-bit interpreter kind of thing - All my 16-bit instructions were prefixed with a BRK (break) instruction, which triggered a call to an IRQ routine which would then start the interpreter - Another thing I did as a kid: building bridges between tech - Commodore disk drives had their own processors - I used to build bridges to conenct these smart peripherals to all sorts of things - Kids today, they're spoiled! You have to remember that a floppy drive back then had throughput similar to a 1200 baud modem. Anyone remember those? - Went to University for a while - Did not do computers in university, I did chemistry and got a doctorate - I used computers, but did not program them - Learned lots of skills, the most of important of which are: - Teaching - Writing - In undergrad, when you turn in a paper, you just get a grade and don't care about the feedback - In grad school you can't do this; your supervisor won't okay it until s/he likes it - When I graduated, I realized I didn't want to "do the science thing" and ended up doing computers - Looked to see of there was a hot new thing that people weren't doing -- in a drag race, if there are fewer competitors, I'd have a good chance of winning - I took up Delphi - My advice: look for something that people aren't much into and link it to someething hard - I did this by building bridges between Delphi and COM - By doing this work, introduced to Michael Edigan, who ended up being a mentor who opened my eyes to new things, including GSL jam - One of these things was XML, which was trendy, hip and even fringe at the time - Ended up working with Don Box (SOAP spec, amongst other things) -- SOAP was awesomeness if you looked at the original intent - This was all before I got into dynamic languages, so I built code generators to make my life easier - Does anyone remember the Treedragon blog? (a couple of hands go up, including mine) - I remember its author, Rhys, ranting about dynamic languages, saying they sucked - I truly believed this - I recommend this book: "Advice to a Young Scientist": P.B. Medawar - Back when I was getting started, wanted to build stuff for people to use - Like many people, the way I did this was via open source - There's an open Source entrepreneur problem: the belief that "if you build it they will come" - Building it might actually be the easy part; getting people to come to your solution may be the hard part - You can get around that by working for a big company - When I interviewed at Microsoft, they didn't tell me what I was interviewing for - I met with Scott Guthrie, who created ASP.NET, after my interview -- he told me about the plan to release a cross-platform version of the CLR and its support for dynamic languages - IronPython is the fastest implementation of Python out there - Of course, "fastest" needs to be defined. After all, there are three kinds of lies, damned lies and bechmarks - It's fastest in terms of throughput, but its startup is slow - It was harder to build IronPython than it should have been - It took a smart guy (Jim Huginin) and a smart team to make lots of little decisions well - Could we get a win the second time and extract a DLR -- dynamic language runtime -- from IronPython? - To prove it would work, we would use the DLR to build other dynamic languages - That was the ideal, then there's the reality - Back in May, we demoed Rails running under IronRuby -- really slowly and consuming a lot of memory - We're now working on performance - Startup time turns out to be more important than you think it is - Unit tests are the worst kind of code you want to run through a compiler -- many are run only once - Realized that we had to go off and build an interpreter - We were working backwards from a compiler - In getting from the language front end to IL, you have to build two trees -- a language-specific tree and a corresponding, more general DLR tree - There's cost in building those 2 trees, and the DLR tree is 10x as costly as the language-sepcific tree - The ideal: we could put effort into building the DLR - We have a working interpreter, just not that fast - Have to adjust goals - The world of Ruby development is "a sea of Macs", which sometimes makes people wonder who the intended audience of IronRuby is - Ask yourself: What parts of my app should I write in Ruby? What shouldn't I write in Ruby? - You're on .NET because of the library - If Rails were "done" -- for some level of "done" -- should portions of it be written in a statically-typed language? - Why should you care what languages the libraries are written in?
- (See slide above -- a photo of balaclava'd protester kids rushing a police barricade) - Don't be one of these kids: it's all gesture, no result - If you really want to make change, you should "enter the belly of the beast" - Find an ally in the beast -- mine was Jim Huginin -- and make the change you want to see from within
RubyFringe: Day 1 Notes, Part 2
Jazzers and Programmers (Nick Sieger)
Nick Sieger had two talks ready and put it to an audience vote. They could pick either:
- Pointless and Time — Wasting Things You Can Do with JRuby, or
- Jazzers and Programmers
As you can see by the title, the audience picked “Jazzers and Programmers”.
Experience the music! Carsten Nielsen put together a muxtape page where you can hear the samples of jazz that Nick used in his presentation.
You should also see Nick Sieger’s blog entry Jazzers and Programmers, which is his presentation in article form.
- Let's trace the evolution of Jazz 1. Swing - A popular, easily accessible style 2. Bebop - Miles Davis - A little less accessible 3. Hard Bop - Addition of soulful, gospel r&b elements 4. Free Jazz - Improvisation with minimal themes - Visceral emotional style 5. Jazz rock / Fusion - Miles Davis (again!) - On the Corner 6. Today - Postmodern jazz? - Jazz rendition of "Iron Man" - Programming is on a similar path - C: like New Orleans hot jazz - Java: like swing? (Groans from audience) - Both are very accessible to the masses, mainstream - What's in the future? - The basis of jazz is the rhythm section - The bassist is typically in the center of the rhythm section - Responsible for both the harmonic foundation *and* beat - Often established using a walking bassline - Piano and drums: comping (short for "acCOMPanyING") - In jazz, these instruments are more about creating sonic textures - The rhythm section is analogous to a programming library, framework or pattern - Bass/drums/piano == Model/view/controller - Musical structures - In a jazz piece, it's typically head / solos / head - The theme is established in the head at the beginning - The solos are based on the theme, but each musician is free to improvise based on the theme - The closing head ties everything together - The Real Book - A big book of sheet music of jazz standards notated by working musicians (without bothering to get the rights) - Allows musicians who don't normally play together to have a common point of reference - In a jam session, musicians call tunes out of the Real Book - It's essentially a "patterns book" - This like common structures provides a common language and organic conventions - There is no "W3C Committee"-like body that dictates how you play jazz - It's all conventions established by musicans floating between bands - Improvisation separates jazz from other styles - Ornette Coleman quote: "When I found out that I could make mistakes, I knew I was onto something." - The structures in jazz provide a framework that actually makes improvisation possible - Inronically, it's these constraints that free you - Communication and persuasion - Improvisation is all about being convincing - It has a back-and-forth conversational element - It's a non-verbal kind of communication - Consider the act of "trading fours": that's where different musicians in a jazz combo take turns playing for four measures, "trading" back and forth with each other: perhaps sax 1 takes 4 measures, then sax 2, then the piano, then the drummer. - Do programmers improvise? - The best programmers have a sense of spontaneity - Consider continual rewrites - Fred Brooks says "Plan to throw one away" - I say "Why stop at one?" - I like it when developers do live coding in front of an audience rather than doing it in advance and running it, or just showing a screencast of them coding - It's fascinating to see the process, especially when it's a good programmer doing live coding. - Jazz musicians make "mistakes" all the time, but they're not mistakes, they're the music - "Do not fear mistakes. There are none." -- Miles Davis - Coding jam session - Musicians jam together; coders should too! - When commenting on a fellow jammer's code, think in terms of "Yes, and..." rather than "Yes, but" - Jazz musicians and altered states - "Write the test cases when sober. Write the code when you're drunk."
Do the Hustle (Obie Fernandez)
From the RubyFringe program booklet:
Sales is an a rt that very few technical people have mastered. Very few. It takes patience, confidence, empathy and a whole slew of other skills mixed together — a brew that is seriously difficult for many geeks to figure out. In this talk, Obie will leverage his experience successfully selling consulting services for both Thoughtworks and Hashrocket to help you with the following questions: How do I figure out how to price my services? How do I figure out the kind of work I want to sell? How do I write contracts and statements of work? What about proposals? And RFPs? How do I close the deal?
- My formula: Get into programming, write a bestselling book, start consultancy, profit! - I've had to make my own luck - I come from a humble background, with no prospects coming out of high school - I landed my first job in IT in 1996 - It was as a Java programmer - I read "Teach Yourself Java in 21 Days" and wore a nice suit to interview - I knew how to present myself - That's what I'm talking about today - I'm talking about hustling! - This is not about scams or cons - It's about being able to jump on opportunities when they present themselves - The dictionary definition of "hustle" is to "obtain by forceful action or persuasion" - Yes, I do mean "forcefully" - The sales cycle, which I will discuss, is made up of these phases: 1. Marketing 2. Qualifying 3. Closing* -- ALWAYS BE CLOSING 4. Maintenance - Marketing - Take a holistic approach - Looking good is a must: often it's what makes or breaks you when trying to get other people to "buy into you" - Your site/blog is your face -- make sure it looks good! - HashRocket logo: - Based on the "=>" is hashes - $15K for design work - Worth it, because it's gorgeous - Don't cheap out on your visual identity!
- Have business cards - Having a business card determines whether or not you have a sales conversation -- if you've got a card, it's much easier to start one that has a hope of converting - Your website is like a business card: it should have correct and complete contact info - Having a phone is very important, and having the phone number on your site is also very important! - We got a lot of customer call within a day of posting our phone number on the site -- we tripled incoming sales contacts! - Encourage word of mouth - Read "Never Eat Alone| - Be altruistic and help people, do favours - "Seed the interactions that lead to good word-of-mouth" - Qualifying - Narrow down your offerings by defining products -- don't "just develop software" in a vague sense - Give yourself constraints - One great constraint to have is a minimum billable rate - Leads should not be qualified by the ultimate decision maker
- Defining success - You can't rush the sales process - Ask yourself this question: Is the team prepared to fulfill or exceed the project requirements? If not, don't take it on! - Determining success criteria involves getting to know the prospective client via conversations. These can be face-to-face, or online, but you must get to know them! - Your own success criteria should remain constant -- write them down!
- Closing - Use master service agreements with attached statement of work documents - These are easy to get client to sign up for, since they have no monetary component - Once someone signs this, they're the client! - Separate deliverables into "type A" and "type B" - Learn to negotiate! - You're worth more than you think - Average rate of $150/hr - See "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely - Client management - Do remarkable work - Read "Purple Cow" by Seth Godin - Don't fear your clients -- make them fear you! - Not in a bad, trembling way - Make them afraid they can lose you if they misbehave - Client yelling at you: grounds for firing the client - Yes, you can fire a client!
Being Dumb and Using it to Your Advantage (Matt Todd)
From the RubyFringe program booklet:
You’re in over your head, dumber than you (and others) think, and you want to matter to your community. What do you do?
There are many good developers in this same position sitting on some dumb ideas simply because they are dumb. I’m challenging you to implement them…let me tell you why. First hand experiences from some dumb developer.
- I'm a nobody - Contributed very little - Lacking good judgement is not a bad thing all the time - Be open to doing things that may seem a little ridiculous - We are too smart for own good - Tons of ideas bad in long run good in short run - Canvas for PHP - Building from scratch: a stretching experience - From doing dumb things: taking chances, making mistakes and taking chances, you get: - Code - Confidence - Experience - "Don't let your good judgement get in the way" - What I learned from Halcyon - Anything can happen - A lot of tech things, maintaining a project openly, you don't combine an app, server and framework all together - I "don't want to fail to connect" - Challenge! - Ideas sitting around the back of your head -- take 'em out! Work on 'em! - Advice - Set yourself up for good problems (such as too many people using your app) - Set goals (including "make it work") - These goals don't have to be time-based - "Creepy eyes! The end!"
The Framework Mass Index: Why Your Web Framework Sucks and You Should Build Your Own (Jeremy McAnally)
From the RubyFringe program booklet:
Frameworks are getting fat. Many times it’s just as easy to build your own stuff that does what you want rather than shoehorning what you want into an existing framework. This talk will discuss experiences in shoving specific functionality into a general framework and some options for curing the problems that were encountered.
- Pete Forde: "It's pronounced Mack-uh-NAL-lee." - They told me to come here and drop a brain bomb - I'm going to present what is "just a bunch of old ideas that need to be repeated" - Beased on Obie's earlier talk, I checked our site and realized that our contact page is broken. That's probably why he haven't gotten any new work in a while. - I'm starting a new project -- a magazine called "The Rubyist", which needs writers, editors and so on. If you're interested in contributing, we want you! - Main point: Keep your framework within its domain - I like Rails - I like like Merb (except for 413 gems) - But frameworks are getting fat - "We're suffering from framework envy" - There are 13,000 classes in .NET - There are 13 web frameworks for Ruby - Rails has 521 classes - Merb has 400 - BMI: Body Mass Index - A measure of obseity based on a weight-height ratio - Not necessarily the best measure: Tom Cruise is obese, if you go by BMI - Maybe the equivalent for BMI in frameworks is WTFs/poung - Comparing the WTFs/pound in frameworks: - Merb has 16,000 WTFs/pound - Sinatra has 7 WTFs/pound - Rails has 12 quatrillion Heinemeiers - And Camping just has "true" - Domain Specificity - Cruft is getting in the way - Have we forgotten YAGNI? - LOL AGILE - wxWidgets is a framework that's good at GUI - .NET is a framework that's good at...? - Rails is a framework that's good at database backed, front end driven web apps - Rails is not good at federated web apps - Integrating legacy systems with Rails is a pain - Don't molest a framework - Problem: Ruby is a hacker's language, and hackers love to hack - You can open up a class and mess with it - This is okay, unless it's bad: - 3 things to consider when making your own framework for a specific domain 1. Joy vs pain ratio when it fails - Does it take too much code to make things happen? 2. Wrench meet mail - Are you using the right tool for the problem? 3. Conventions rock - Favour conventions, be consistent! - Tools at your disposal: - Rack -- framework for writing frameworks - merb_core (if you need a little more fanciness) - Use common sense: Don't hack a framework for the sake of hacking!
There Will be Porn (Zed Shaw)
From the RubyFringe program booklet:
I’ll go through 10 truly horrible ideas that I’ve implemented or thought about, all created just for RubyFringe.
- Pete: Don't be put off by that "AUGGGGGH!" stuff on his blog... he's really a super-nice guy - GWAR-riffic intro song (available at his site) - This is the best conference! - Small conferences are the best; the giant conferences suck - This is my Ruby retirement - I will not be back. No more Ruby code. No more Ruby conferences - WorkingWithRails.com -- if you're worried about your popularity on this site, you're a whore - I'm currently writing a book, "How to build the greatest ruby server ever" - I'll also be writing a book after that: "Protocols and performance" - I consider myself an observer and an "anti-pundit" - And now, my ideas! - Idea #1 - To-do lists are hot - Porn is even hotter - Social networks are hottest! - I combined them - Imagine a giant todo list. Just one, where everybody just adds to it. And at the same time, you upload porn! - You get everyone's to-do lists and everyone's porn - Idea #2 - Pornmagnet.tv - Imagine Miro but with all the free porn uploaded and ready for you! - One-handed operation - If you can't be a chick magnet, be a porn magnet - Idea #3, which I actaully might just implement - chaos2congress.us - It hate politicians of all stripes. I want to get rid of all of them - Maybe I'll start by just removing incumbents. I want to fuzz incumbents. Let's pick a random guy and make his day bad - The website would list all memebrs of congress members - People could leave short statements about any member of congress that would "kick 'em in the nuts" - The top-rated and verified statments would be collected - Based on those, the site would automatically launch a war-dial campaign to "fuck up that senator's day" - "Oh wow, I'm so not getting back into the US" - I'm so tired of making web applications - I put together some code to help me play some "fucked up songs" - The result: Inculcator - Just PyGame and Ecasound - Didn't take long to make - I've got T-shirts!
Zed devoted the rest of the presentation to his Ruby “swan songs” — four numbers which he constructed on stage using Inculcator to record tracks and the salmagundi of music and computer gear shown in the photo below:
Zed’s gear consisted of:
- Traveler guitar
- Boss “Dr. Beat” DB-90 metronome/guitar preamp
- “Snowball” microphone by Blue Microphones
- and a subnotebook laptop that I can’t identify.
The four numbers he constructed and performed were:
- Zed Jumped the Shark (940K MP3)
- Matz Can’t Patch (1.7MB MP3)
- Don’t Fuck Up Chad’s Community (2.1MB MP3)
- Goodbye Friends (3.6MB MP3)
You can download them by clicking on the links above or by visiting their Internet Archive page, where you’ll find them in various formats. Zed put them in the public domain — in his own words: “I’ll nevermanke any money off them.”
In the photo of Zed’s setup, you can see four boxes on the left side. They’re t-shirts which have been compressed into cubes. Zed customized them by hand-painting “ZSFA” (short for “Zed’s So Fucking Awesome”, the name of his blog) on them. They were rewards given to people who supplied the vocal samples (“Zed jumped the shark”) for Zed Jumped the Shark. Those people were: Hampton Catlin, Deb, one unidentified person and Yours Truly.
Here’s what the t-shirt looked like after I extracted it from its cube:
For Zed’s perspective on the event and his presentation, see his article titled RubyFringe 2008 – Killing Floor in Toronto.
RubyFringe: Day 1 Notes, Part 1
Here’s the first of my notes from RubyFringe, the non-corporate, almost-non-sponsored, edgy Ruby-but-not-Rails conference organized by the folks at Unspace and held in Toronto (a.k.a. “Accordion City”) on July 18th – 20th, 2008. I’ve read on a lot of blogs that people have been calling it “the best Ruby conference ever” — I might go so far to say that it’s the best tech conference I’ve been to.
This first set of notes covers the following presentations:
- Adhearsion (Jay Phillips)
- Deployment Monoculture / Scaling Ruby Down (Dan Grigsby)
- Rockstar Memcaching (Tobias Lutke)
- Living on the Edge (Yehuda Katz)
- Testing is Overrated (Luke Francl)
Adhearsion (Jay Phillips)
From the RubyFringe program booklet:
Jay Phillips will talk about what’s been changing in the Adhearsion and VoIP scene and how people with virtually no VoIP experience can use Ruby and Adhearsion to write their first application in this generally foreign world of technology. If you’re building a Rails web application, with Adhearsion you could consider leveraging voice as a new, cutting-edge feature of it. If you’re a cowboy hacker with more personal ambitions, Jay will also talk about fun hacker projects and how you can go about implementing them. The world of voice is certainly a growing market and it can’t hurt to know a little about the technology!
- "Voice development on the fringe" - "There's opportunity in the fringe" - "Web development has this problem...it's saturated with innovation" - Rails integration is a one-liner - Asterisk's config file: complex and looooooong, app-specific config syntax - Adhearsion's config: Ruby Q&A - Does it scale? Yes - Asterisk breaks down at about 130 simul calls -- new box after that
Deployment Monoculture / Scaling Ruby Down (Dan Grigsby)
From the RubyFringe program booklet:
Most conversations about scaling Ruby web apps are pointed in the wrong direction. Instead of talking about whether Ruby can scale up — I think we all agree it can — I’d like to see it scale down.
As an entrpreneur, I launch dozens of ideas before I pick the one to turn into a startup. The Rails-inspired approach of deploying long running instances of the runtime, one or more per app, doesn’t scale down to support even a few side-by-side applications.
Instead of reflexively arguing that EC2 is cheap enough, this talk will challenge some base assumptions, take a hint and some inspiration from Google App Engine, and suggest another angle for deploying Ruby-based web apps.
- The programmer/entrepreneur lifestyle - Attractive - Hits the "sweet spot" -- lets you be who you are - It's all about controlling your own destiny - The trick is to find opportunities to build stuff and match it with people who want that stuff - Barrel research - It's a way of looking at markets and opportunities - Think of all the markets and opportunities out there as the volume within a barrel - Think of anything released into the market as a rock dropped into the barrel - The size of the rock in the barrel represents the size of the corresponding project or opportunity - Big rocks represent big projects taken on by big organizations - There are plenty of gaps between the big rocks, which can be filled in by smaller stones, representing smaller projects executed by smaller teams - It's fractal -- there are smaller gaps between the smaller stones, which can be filled in with sand, which represents even smaller projects by even smaller teams. - The ideal team size these days: about 3 - Our current tools allow us to create well-crafted stuff with a small team - Consider icanhascheezburger.com -- employs 9 people - "Happy end of the Mythical Man-Month" - If you're a hacker and have good hacker friends, you can do well - With this in mind, what ideas should you implement? - "Late-bound ideas" - You want to make multiple, small, narrowly-focused bets - Act darwinistically -- take on a number of projects and cull those that aren't "fit to survive" - Psychology and "Free" - Cheap is not free - Worry about spending money - Small psychological inputs can have a very large impact - Treat non-free things as dependencies -- try to get rid of them - Eliminating non-free things is part of a larger process: eliminating inefficiencies - If a customer is worth $100 -- Google will try to charge me $99 for it - Whoever your potential customer is, there'll always be someone out there who's going to spend more money than you trying to land that customer - Disproportional Reward - This part of the talk is going to be all about market hacks, "fuzzing the market" and getting a result that is disproportionately greater than the time/effort/money you put in - They're all tech-driven: does not require you to be a salesperson - These approaches are tech- and marketing-based 1. Breaking into the walled garden - PayMe.com was Pepsi to PayPal's Coke, with about 10% market share - We realized that auction buyers would be the big adopters of systems like ours, so we approached eBay who wouldn't take our ads because of an exclusive agreement - We found out that eBay had relationship with LinkExchange -- they sold a lot of ads in eBay - We bought out LinkExchange ads, many of which ended up appearing on eBay pages as per their arrangement, effectively doing an end run around eBay's refusal, getting out ads on their pages against their wishes - Exploiting this non-obvious relationship made our company successful 2. Baby's Mamma - The parenting market has a strong geographic component: new parents tend to clump together in the same neighbourhoods - Certain postal codes are parent-rich - Going after parents? Find out where new schools are being built -- that's where they are - School websites post which of their teachers are going on maternity leave -- send their colleagues coupons! - Take a page from the stalker book: use readily-available demographic information, sych as driver's licence registration, voter info registration - Do analysis on that information - Look for info that ties them to a specific demographic -- consider names that belong to specific generations, like "Hildegarde" - Use Freedom of Information Act requests - For example, Nate's dad gets an National Science Founation database of people who just got funding and uses it to cold call them - Often, he would be the first person to inform them that they got the funding, making him the bearer of good news and thus more likely to make the sale 3. Tai Chi Marketing - I wrote a script to auto-fill contact forms that I knew would lead to my getting called by a telesales person - I got calls from telesales people, whose jobs are tough - I'd explain that I wasn't likely to buy what they were selling, but told them that I have a product that would make their job easier; could they introduce me to their boss?" - End result: an inbound sales call was redirected and turned into a sale to them - Making emotional connection with people is key "At this point in the list, we're now approaching that fine line that separates an entrepreneur from a criminal 4. Dorm Spam - My first job: selling white box computers at dorms, a la Michael Dell - My major cost: shipping flyers - So I used the inter-campus mail system to send the flyers 5. Tragedy of the Commons for Fun and Profit - This was in the era of desktop-based file-sharing clients like Scour, Kazaa and eDonkey - Shared a lot of windows media files with the names of popular videos and movies - .WMV files back then could include an instruction to pop open a browser window pointing to a specific URL when the file was played - We used this as advertising Don't short this stuff: - As programmers, we have a tendency to bury ourselves in coding when things get tough - Some problems can't be solved with tech - Learn about handling people
Rockstar Memcaching (Tobias Lutke)
From the RubyFringe program booklet:
Memcached is what makes the web fast. It’s also the simplest thing ever: you put a little memory aside for it, you put some keys in, you get them out at a later time.
So why the hell do all of you geniuses use it wrong? I’ll teach you how to tackle your performance issues using memcached once and for all.
- "I'm here to present the most boring talk of the entire conference" - Memcached: "like a hash with Alzheimer's" - Originally for LJ ("which is about people cutting themselves) - Lots of people use memcache - How does memcached work? - Talking to servers - Simple protocol: get, set, delete - What do you store in it? - Object caches - after save to database, save it to cache - Expiry options - flush_all: the nuclear option - :expires_in - use an observer -- delete an activity after saves - Unique ID lookup
Living on the Edge (Yehuda Katz)
From the Rubyfringe program booklet:
Ruby is growing up quickly, and a number of Ruby’s mainstays are falling by the wayside. I’m talking about classics like Rails, Rake, Rdoc and much much more. This talk will help you squeeze even more developer productivity out of the latest edge tools that will be the mainstays a year from now. Of course, living on the edge is a dangerous game, so I’ll cover how to sanely keep abreast of the latest and greatest without having to spend all your time keeping your tool chain up and running.
I intend to cover Merb and DataMapper (briefly, as they are rapidly reaching escape velocity from the Land of Edge), Thor, YARD, basis and Johnson. I will also cover other edge tools that are released between time of printing and Rubyfringe. Rock on!
1. Merb - Not really edge anymore, but still worth playing with - Monolithic-ness not everything it's cracked up to be - Merb lets you pick and choose - Large community - Stats: "I don't have numbers, but this is real!" - You probably want to use Merb off edge - Sake: - Does all the work cloning multiple git repositories 2. DataMapper - NonSQL things - Hard to get set up - You should be using Github -- see github.org - "It's pretty much where Ruby edge is at" 3. Sake - Lets us set up tasks 4. Thor - Rake + Sake + Optparse 5. YARD - Bigger than just an RDoc replacement 6. Johnson - Rhino for Ruby - A full Ruby-JavaScript bridge - Lots of support for JavaScript expressions - What's it for? - Server-side JS - Templates that work on client and server - Browserless tsting, potential - Optimizing Ruby?
Testing is Overrated (Luke Francl)
From the RubyFringe program booklet:
Develper-driven testing is probably the most influential software development technique of the last 10 – 15 years. There’s no question that it has improved the practice of building software. And in a dynamic language like Ruby, it’s hard to get by without it. But is it really the best way to find defects? Or is the emphasis on testing and test coverage barking up the wrong tree?
- Testing is a programmer's solution to the problem of bugs - Coding's what we do, so why not make the solution out of code? - What's wrong with this? 1. Testing is hard - Developers tend to write clean tests describing the normal execution - Tend not to write "dirty" tests, which check non-normal cases, such as out-of-bounds conditions, bad data, various error states - Mature orgs write more dirty tests 2. You can't test code that's not there 3. Tests have bugs - A number of studies have shown that tests are just as likely to have bugs as the code they're testing - Who tests the tests? - There's also the matter of developers who comment out tests just in order to "get stuff done" 4. Developer testing isn't very good at finding defects - Complements to developer testing
1. Manual testing - A good tester is worth his/her weight in gold - A good tester I know is not only good at explaining how the bug occurred, but also very thorough about providing info about it, including the stack trace - Have testers do it rather than programmers -- besides, programmers hate it - Testers are also responsible for verifying fixes -- don't take the programmer's word that the bug has been fixed, confirm it!
2. Code reviews - A good measure of code quality is the number of "WTFs per minute" during the code review - The polite code review definition of "WTF" is "What is this function?" - There are sociological considerations for code reviews -- you are, after all, leaving your creation (and by extension, you) open to criticism - Try to find bugs, not rip your collegaues to shreds - Code reviews can motivate you to code better - Can code reviews make better developers? Possibly: consider Robert Glass' argument that reading code can help make you a better developer 3. Usability testing - Fun and easy - Jeff Atwood: Usability test failure is the ultimate unit test failure - The cheap way to do usability testing is to follow the model of Steve "Don't Make Me Think" Krug's "Lost our lease" usability lab: the testing computer and a camera, with you following the user through your application - "Don't get me wrong: I write tests, I'm just not fanatical about it"