Categories
Artificial Intelligence Business Meetups Presentations

Meet Madtech.AI: Notes from Bill Lederer’s presentation at AI Salon: St. Pete/Tampa Bay

If you were at spARK Labs in St. Pete last night for AI Salon: St. Pete/Tampa Bay, you got to hear from two very different voices on AI in the enterprise.

Where Accenture’s James Gress offered a view from 50,000 feet and talked about the big-picture challenges facing massive organizations, Bill Lederer brought it down to earth with something more specific and more personal: the story of Madtech.AI, his B2B SaaS startup, built in St. Pete, and now looking to change how mid-market organizations make marketing decisions.

Bill’s been in this space a long time. He’s been a Wall Street executive, a professor, and now he’s a founder. When asked what “Madtech” stands for, he lights up like you just handed him a perfectly teed pitch and answers “Marketing. Advertising. Data. Technology.” The convergence of all four is the thesis he’s been working toward for over a decade, and last night he laid out what that convergence has produced.

Bill’s Madtech presentation

The Problem: Your data’s a mess, and you know it!

Madtech.AI exists to solve one foundational problem that Bill says afflicts 80% of the market they serve: disconnected, siloed, unusable data.

This isn’t not a glamorous problem. It doesn’t make for great conference keynotes. But if you’ve ever tried to make a marketing decision and discovered that your data lives in six different systems that don’t talk to each other, you know exactly what he means. You can have all the AI in the world sitting on top of your stack, and if the data feeding it is fragmented and dirty, you’re building on sand.

Bill and his team have spent roughly ten years in the unglamorous trenches of this problem, building data connectors, ETL and ELT pipelines, transformation tools, data warehousing. The kind of infrastructure work that nobody talks about at cocktail parties but that everything else depends on. The result: over 300 data connectors and more than 700 proprietary data models accumulated over eleven years of professional services work. That’s a significant moat, even if it doesn’t sound like one.

The metric that stopped the room

Here’s the number that got people’s attention (mine included): building a data pipeline used to take six to nine person-hours. Madtech.AI has that down to three minutes, fully deployed and tested. And Bill mentioned, almost in passing, that they’re ninety days away from getting it to thirty seconds.

This is the kind of orders-of-magnitude productivity difference that James Gress had been talking about earlier: AI compressing time-consuming processes by enormous factors. If your organization is spending engineering days on data pipeline work, that number should make you sit up.

Who they’re built for (hint: probably you!)

Bill was explicit about Madtech.AI not chasing the Fortune 500. He wasn’t thinking about enterprise clients when he built the platform. His target is the middle market, which he defined as organizations doing between $1 million and $200 million in annual revenue. They’re actively going after.about 20,000 target enterprises.

Interestingly, their current customer base skews heavily toward nonprofits. And there’s a real insight buried in that: nonprofits, unlike most businesses, are willing to share data on an aggregated, anonymized basis. That willingness unlocks something powerful. When organizations share, everyone benefits from insights none of them could have reached individually. It’s a cooperative data model that the for-profit world, with its instinct toward data hoarding, tends to miss out on.

Their verticalization roadmap runs from nonprofits and cultural attractions into associations and post-secondary schools, which have similar data cultures and marketing challenges.

The price point is the point

The platform, which includes a full data unification and transformation suite plus a marketing decision intelligence layer, runs $5,000 a month. Flat. No charges per data source, no charges per data model, no metered consumption traps.

Bill made the comparison explicitly: buying these capabilities separately, or having someone build them for you, would normally run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. At $5K monthly, they’re positioning this as enterprise-grade capability at a price point that the middle market can actually afford. That’s the bet.

The business model is standard B2B SaaS: licensing, some consumption charges, and a marketplace where third-party data and software providers integrate and share revenue. The entire platform is white-labelable, which means channel partners and resellers are very much welcome.

They’re raising, and they’re hiring

Bill was refreshingly direct about where Madtech.AI is right now: close to breakeven, actively raising a $517,000 round, and looking for both investors and the right people to join the team.

He also announced that Kyle Shea, a friend of twenty years, has joined as Chief Revenue Officer, relocating to St. Pete from Fort Lauderdale. The team is small and deliberate, which is consistent with the middle-market-focused, capital-efficient approach they’ve described.

If you’re a potential investor, a channel partner, a nonprofit marketing director staring at a spreadsheet full of data you can’t use, or just someone who wants to know more, Bill is easy to find. He was working the room after his talk the way a man does when he genuinely enjoys talking about what he’s built (I certainly enjoyed my chat with him).

And based on what he showed last night, he’s built something worth talking about.

Categories
Artificial Intelligence Business Career Work

The key to thriving in the AI age is beating the bottlenecks

One of Nate B. Jones’ recent videos has the title Why the Smartest AI Bet Right Now Has Nothing to Do With AI (It’s Not What You Think). While the title is technically correct, I think it should be changed to In the Age of AI, You Have to Beat the Bottlenecks.

Bottleneck: a definition

Many Global Nerdy readers aren’t native English speakers, so here’s a definition of “bottleneck”:

A bottleneck is a specific point where a process slows down or stops because there is too much work and not enough capacity to handle it. It is the one thing that limits the speed of everything else.

Imagine a literal bottle of water.

  • The body of the bottle is wide and holds a lot of water.

  • The neck (the top part) is very narrow.

  • When you try to pour the water out quickly, it cannot all come out at once. It has to wait to pass through the narrow neck.

In business or technology, the “bottleneck” is that narrow neck. No matter how fast you work elsewhere, everything must wait for this one slow part.

Elon is often wrong, but you can learn from his wrongness

My personal rule is that when Elon Musk says something, and especially when it’s about AI, turn it at least 90 degrees. At the most recent World Economic Forum gathering in Davos, he talked a great “abundance” game, with sci-fi claims that AI would create unlimited economic expansion and plenitude for all:

Nate Jones watched the talk with Musk, but came to the conclusion that Musk’s take is the wrong frame for the immediate future. The current AI era will be one of bottlenecks, not abundance. I agree, as I’ve come to that conclusion about any grandiose statement that Musk makes; after all, he is Mr. “we’ll have colonies on Mars real soon now.

Here are my notes from Jones’ video…

Notes

Instead of abundance, Nate suggests that what we are entering is a “bottleneck economy.” While AI capability is growing, the actual value it produces won’t automatically flow everywhere and benefit everyone. Instead, it will concentrate around specific areas based on AI’s constraints and limitations [00:00].

Research from Cognizant claims AI could unlock $4.5 trillion in U.S. labor productivity (and yes, you need to take that figure with a huge grain of salt), and it comes with a massive caveat: businesses must implement AI effectively. Currently, there’s a wide gap between AI models and the hard work of integrating them into business workflows. This “value gap” means that the trillion-dollar impact won’t materialize until organizations figure out how to bridge the distance between models can do in general and what they can specifically do for a company’s operations [01:01].

Physical infrastructure is the first bottleneck. AI capability is increasingly constrained by things it needs from the physical world, specifically land, power, and skilled trade workers. Building the data centers required to train and run models takes years, and not just for the building process, but also permitting and connections to the power grid. This creates a wedge between the speed of software development and building infrastructure  [03:56].

Beyond just buildings and power, the hardware supply chain is the second bottleneck. Access to compute, high-bandwidth memory, and advanced chip manufacturing (controlled largely by TSMC) determines who gets a seat at the table. Companies that understand this are securing resources years in advance and treating regions with stable power and friendly permitting as strategic assets. This creates a market where value is captured by those navigating physical constraints in addition to building better algorithms [06:02].

The third bottleneck is one you might not have thought of: the cost of trust. As the cost of generating content collapses to near zero, the cost of trust is skyrocketing. Jone highlights what he calls a “trust deficit,” calling it a major coordination bottleneck. When any content can be fabricated, the ability to verify and authenticate information becomes expensive and crucial. Value will shift to institutions, platforms, or individuals who can mediate trust and provide a reliable signal in world rapidly filling with synthetic media slop [07:36].

For organizations, there’s the bottleneck of applying general AI to specific contexts. A general AI model won’t know a company’s private code base, board politics, or competitive dynamics. The bridge between “AI can do this” and “AI does this usefully here” requires tacit knowledge; that is, the practices and relationships that aren’t written down but live in the heads of the company’s employees. Companies that solve this integration problem will unlock productivity, while those that don’t will spend lots of money on tools they never use [09:55].

The fifth bottleneck is another one you might not have though of: the increasing value of taste. For individuals,  and especially for those in tech, the bottlenecks are shifting from acquiring skill to getting good at making judgment calls. AI is commoditizing hard skills like programming (it’s cutting down the time to proficiency from years to months), the really valuable skills are going to be taste and curation. The ability to distinguish between AI output that’s “good enough” versus AI output that’s extraordinary will become the differentiator. Developing taste takes experience, time, and observation. This is going to create a dangerous race for early-career professionals, whose entry-level work is being devalued [14:52].

The combination of problem-finding and execution are the sixth bottleneck. When problem-solving becomes automated, finding the problem and executing on the solution become the new moats. The market will reward those who can frame the right questions and navigate the ambiguity of implementing appropriate solutions. Jones emphasizes that while AI can generate a strategy or a plan, it can’t execute the “grinding work” of follow-through, holding people accountable, and navigating organizational politics. Success depends on identifying these new personal bottlenecks rather than optimizing for old skills that AI is turning into commodities [16:50].


Tips for techies and developers to beat the bottlenecks

  • Cultivate a sense for taste in addition to a skill for syntax. As coding moves from purely “grind” to at least partially “vibe” (see my vibe code vs. grind code post), your value shifts from writing code to reviewing AI-generated code. You need to refine your sense of what makes code good to differentiate yourself from the flood of AI output, which tends towards the average. [15:06]
  • Specialize! To beat the “good enough” standard of AI, pick a niche, and specialize in it. The window for being a generalist is closing, and extraordinary depth allows you to spot quality that AI (which once again, tends towards the average) misses. [16:16]
  • Pivot to problem finding. AI makes a lot of problem solving cheap, which makes problem finding the rare and precious thing. Stop defining yourself solely as a problem solver. Focus on defining the right problems to solve, framing the architecture, and determining direction. This management-level skill is harder for AI to replicate than execution. [16:50]
  • Value tacit knowledge and context. Tacit knowledge is the “soft” knowledge of how an organization works, and it’s almost never documented (at least directly), but lives in the heads of the people working there. Knowing why a legacy codebase exists or understanding specific stakeholder needs is a “context moat” that general AI models can’t easily infer. [17:36]
  • Focus on execution and follow-through. AI can generate the plan/code, but it can’t navigate the friction of deployment. The “grinding work” of implementation, such as convincing teams, fixing integration bugs, and finalizing products, is where the real value now lies. [18:47]
  • Build your tolerance for ambiguity. This has always been good for real life, but now it’s also good for tech work, which used to live in rigid, well-defined, unambiguous spaces… but not anymore! The tech landscape is shifting rapidly, and the ability to remain functional and productive while “metabolizing change” and dealing with uncertainty is a critical soft skill that separates leaders from people who freeze when things become ambiguous. [20:01]
  • Audit your personal bottlenecks: Be honest about what is actually constraining your career right now. It might not be learning a new framework (the old bottleneck). Instead, it might be your ability to integrate AI tools into your workflow or your ability to communicate complex ideas. Find those bottlenecks and come up with strategies to overcome them! [21:25]
Categories
Business

On Netflix buying WB

Categories
Business Humor

“But ad blockers spoil the mood!”

This will go in next Saturday’s picdump, but it was too good not to share now.

(Global Nerdy doesn’t run ads anymore, so feel free to “raw dog” this blog.)

Categories
Artificial Intelligence Business What I’m Up To

Catch our webinar about rethinking the way we pay for knowledge work in the age of AI this Thursday, July 10!

On Thursday, July 10 at 2:30 p.m. Eastern (11:30 a.m. Pacific / 1830 UTC), tune in to a webinar on rethinking the way businesses pay for knowledge work featuring:

Fatin Kwasny, Founder and CEO of Fractio
Yours Truly, Sales Engineer at Fractio

If your business is still pricing or accepting labor from knowledge workers…

  • by the hour,
  • by the project,
  • or even worse, by retainer or
  • by time & materials…

…you’re already losing — and AI will only make it worse.

In this webinar, we’ll discuss how:

  • Companies are leaking up to 50% of labor spend due to idle time, misaligned scopes, and outdated compensation models.
  • AI as a capital cost is shifting the rules of value creation — and why time-based knowledge work is the next labor bubble to burst.
  • A usage-based labor model like Fractio’s can eliminate muda (a Japanese term for wastefulness that the Six Sigma crew like to use) and protect your bottom line in a future where efficiency is non-negotiable.

We’ll also show some actual data from companies already seeing at least 10x ROI by shifting how they price or accept knowledge work.

Join us this Thursday, July 10 at 2:30 p.m. Eastern (11:30 a.m. Pacific / 1830 UTC) for our webinar, From Time to Throughput: Rewriting Labor Economics in the Age of AI!

It’ll be an entertaining, informative discussion, featuring 45 minutes of presentation followed by a 15-minute Q&A session.

Click here to register for this FREE online event.

Fractio is a SaaS that enables companies to pay for knowledge work on a “per-thing-done” basis instead of the less efficient per-hour, per-project, or on retainer. (Think paying for a rideshare versus paying for a taxi.)

At Synapse Summit 2025, Fractio was the winner of the of the Startup Innovation Award, which recognizes emerging ventures that are making waves and redefining what’s possible.

Categories
Business Systems

I’ll admit it: I thought Skype had already shut down

Once upon a time, “Skype” was synonymous with “audio chat” and then “video chat.” But that was a while back, and Zoom, Slack, Discord, and (grudgingly) Teams have taken over.

I hadn’t used Skype in so long that I’d thought the service had already been shot down — but that’s actually happening in May, according to Microsoft’s article, The next chapter: Moving from Skype to Microsoft Teams .

So my first reaction was “Skype is still around?”

My second reaction:

Categories
Business

Resume-generating events

At last night’s meetup held by the Tampa Bay Product Group, presenter Jamel Canty put up a slide with a phrase I’ve always liked, but haven’t seen in a while:

“Resume-generating events.”

He was using it in the same sense as a similar phrase: career-limiting move: an action, behavior, or colossal screw-up that leads to your dismissal, which in turn necessitates your generating revised resumes as you start a new job search.

“Resume-generating event” also has another meaning: a major warning sign at a company (examples: an ominous all-hands meeting, a merger or acquisition, a Boeing-style product failure) that causes employees of a company to start looking for work elsewhere.

Given the current work environment, assisted by the culture’s general slouch towards authoritarianism and the balance of power favors management, expect to see this phrase used more often.