Judge Grounds Apple, Forces It to Wear Sign Admitting It Said Nasty Stuff About Samsung

Image from ForkParty. Click to see the original.

Apple has been ordered by Judge Colin Birss, who oversaw the UK Apple/Samsung design infringement case, to publish notices stating that Samsung didn’t copy the iPad for its tablet designs. The notices must appear on Apple’s UK site as well as UK newspapers and magazines for a six-month period. This requirement is a meant to counter any loss of “face” from Apple’s claims that Samsung is a copycat and may also be intended to discourage future lawsuits of a similar nature.

(The ruling reminds me of those kids who’ve been made to wear signs in public as punishment for their misdeeds.)

The ruling means that Apple will have to provide six months of free advertising for their biggest rival, which certainly won’t sit well with them. There are no publicized reports on the specific requirements for these notices, so it remains to be seen what Apple can or can’t say in their notices. At the very least, they should be able to reference Judge Birss’ official remarks, which state that Samsung’s designs “do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool.” They can say something to the effect of “Our stuff is cooler than Samsung’s…so says the law!

Apple has one advantage that Samsung doesn’t: loyal and very vocal customer evangelists. They’re probably their best tool to turn the effect of this ruling around and change the court-ordered postings from an embarrassment into a PR coup. It’s already started — take a look at these recent tweets:

One reply on “Judge Grounds Apple, Forces It to Wear Sign Admitting It Said Nasty Stuff About Samsung”

You can bet the bigger part of smartphone users understands the message pretty well, no matter how clever Apple’s PR spin doctors will try to word it. While Samsung might not have the same loyal fans as Appe, Android certainly has.

Comments are closed.